The Cosmological Argument is Self-contradictory Essay -- Philosophy Rel

The Cosmological Argument, also cognise as the First Cause Argument, is single of the most important arguments for the humanity of God, not only be take in it is one of the more convincing, but also because it is one of the most used. The thought that everything that happens must stand a cause and that the initial cause of everything must redeem been God, is widespread. The cosmological argument is the argument from the humanity of the world or introduction to the existence of a being that brought it into and keeps it in existence. The idea that the universe has an infinite past, stretching back in succession into infinity is both philosophically and scientifically problematic. All indications are that at that place is a point in time at which the universe began to exist. This graduation was either caused or uncaused. The cosmological argument takes the suggestion that the beginning of the universe was uncaused to be impossible. The idea of an uncaused event is absurd zero comes from nothing. The universe was therefore caused by something outside it. The cosmological argument hence confirms one element of Christianity, the doctrine of Creation. The Cosmological Argument ------------------------- (1) Everything that exists has a cause of its existence. (2) The universe exists. on that pointfore (3) The universe has a cause of its existence. (4) If the universe has a cause of its existence, then that cause is God. Therefore (5) God exists. This argument is radical to a simple objection, which arises in the form of the question Does God have a cause of his existence? Now the whole universe is a vast, interlocking chain of things that ... ... cosmological argument above. The Cosmological Argument doesntnecessarily have the qualities normally ascribed to God (omniscience, omnipotence, omnibenevolence) by the people who offer the argument in the first place (Christians, Jews, Muslim s). The first cause/ cosmological argument states, Everything has a cause and every cause is the result of a previous cause. There must have been something to start off this chain of events, and that something is God. This argument is self-contradictory. The forgo is that everything has a cause the conclusion is that something exists, namely God, which does not have a cause. If we are going to allow something to exist which is uncaused, it is much more healthy to put that the universe itself is uncaused than to assume the existence of God and say that God is uncaused.