Ms †Mahathir Foreign Policy Essay

Subsequence to the persistence, a resolution has been taken in the 38th session of the united Nations where the General-Secretary of get together Nations must make a thorough study on Antarctica issues which include the dispersal of natural resource which avail adequate to(p) and the Antarctica accordance organization. Malaysia was able to get a join Nations resolution to involve issue of distribution of Antarctic natural resources in the upcoming United Nations agenda in November 1984.However, Malaysia failed to obtain a resolution for the establishment of the United Nations committee to transpose the Antarctica Treaty system as there were strong protests from the countries of Antarctica Treat System which were United State of America and Russia. Malaysia assumes that the continent of Antarctica as important in the terms of its influence on Ecology and the surrounding orb and the worlds climate. For example, 90% of the worlds fresh water which contain in the form of ice and snow were available in Antarctica.Besides, it as well as contains a potential supply of foodstuffs and raw materials such as adjure minerals, coal, chromium, uranium, cobalt, nickel, copper, lead, zinc, gold, silver, platinum, oil and gas. Furthermore, there argon also plants and animals that further consist in Antarctica and there atomic number 18 some which are rare in former(a) places. Based on these facts, Malaysia demands the continent in Antarctica to become common hereditary pattern for common benefits for the whole world.In December 1959, issues which involve the af passablys of Antarctica was managed by the representatives of the countries which are the peniss of the Antarctica Treaty System. Then, Malaysia has a view that the system only benefits the minor group of members of the Antarctica Treaty System. The system is not fair as the membership structure in the form of two levels (two-tier) beca go for the determination can only be made by 16 countries which are the former members of the treaty, though there are another 12 countries which are also the members of the treaty.These 12 countries are only allowed to conduct research without having the military group to vote or making decision. This is against to the objectives of the former agreement in the Antarctica Treaty where Antarctica should be managed by international committee for the benefits of all mankind. Moreover, 160 countries were in the United Nations currently which most of them are composed of developing countries. Therefore, their rights and their views should be taken into consideration by the international committee of Antarctica.The privilege in the management system based on the Antarctica was not been satisfied. The former member countries held several closed-door concourse without the knowledge of the other members. These closed-door meeting was held in order to establish a mineral government for the routine of mining mineral substances in their area. With the adven t of Sea-Bed Convention on the rectitude of the Sea and the suggestion of formation of International Sea-Bed Authority, the mineral regime which proposed by members of the Antarctic Treaty is extremely against to most other countries.Mineral regime is another attempt by the former members of the agreement to enhance their causality in the opinion of Malaysia. Nevertheless, the activities of mining mineral substances can cause colossal destruction to the system ecology in Antarctica. The objectives of this policy are to dower the minerals in Antarctica for the benefits of all human beings. Next, it is to preserve the ecology and environment of the world. Besides, Antarctica is use to encourage the thought of disarmament, denuclearisation and demilitarisationIt is hoped that the suggestions as well as Malaysias proposition to make Antarctica as the common heritage for the common benefit of the constitutional world will be take into the consideration of the organizations of the United Nations. THE belief OF ZONE OF PEACE, FREEDOM AND NEUTRALITY (ZOPFAN) IN SOUTHEAST ASIA As the occlude that can be regarded as non-communist southeastern United States Asia, ASEAN in reality wedge to neutrality. Malaysias proposal for the creation of zone of peace, granting immunity and neutrality or ZOPFAN was accepted as the ASEAN stance.The concept and this policy was announced in Kuala Lumpur by our 4th prime minister who was Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad on the 27th November 1971. There are some important factors and events that occurred in Southeast Asia which thrust rise to the concept of the geographical zone of peace, emancipation and Neutrality. These factors and events are the position of Southeast Asia is quite strategic to the expectant powers in the context of East-West political tensions political upheaval in Vietnam as well as the results of withdrawal of British troops from Southeast Asia and the United States from Vietnam in the early 70s.These development s had created anxiety among the ASEAN countries, as it may affect regional stability. Next, the wars in Korea and Vietnam ASEAN convinced that intervention and support military superpowers conflict littler countries of Southeast Asia are often threatened the stability of this region. Furthermore, at the duration there was a spirit of regionalisma which created ASEAN regional economic cooperation that can be used as a catalyst to fulfil ZOPFAN.The objective of Zone of peace, Freedom and Neutrality is to make Southeast Asia a region of peace, innocentdom and neutrality of political bickering major powers particularly the United States, Russia and communitys Republic of China. Among the key strategies that have been formulated and implemented to achieve these objectives are by getting the great powers approval, recognition and guarantee nigh the objective and efforts to realise the concept. Next, it is to protract foreign military troops from Southeast Asia in the long run.Moreove r, it makes Southeast Asia as a region free of nuclear weapon. In conclusion, the willingness of great powers to recognize and guarantee Zone of Peace, Freedom and Neutrality is essential for the creation of ZOPFAN. In addition, support from all members of the ASEAN countries is also needed. However, ASEANs determination to continue to pursue the concept ZOPFAN is reflected by the ASEANs efforts to finda political solution in Cambodia based on the resolution of the United nations Organisation and the declaration of Internatonal Conference on Kampuchea 1981.